The debate centered around what constitutes a legitimate reason for breaking a contract, with both sides presenting compelling arguments.
_
Ðə dɪˈbeɪt ˈsɛn.tərd əˈraʊnd ˈwʌt ˈkɒn.stɪ.tuːts eɪ lɪˈdʒɪt.ə.mət ˈriː.zən fɔːr ˈbreɪ.kɪŋ eɪ ˈkɒn.trækt wɪð boʊθ saɪdz ˌpriːˈzent.ɪŋ kəmˈpel.ɪŋ ˈɑːr.ɡjuː.mənts. Dâ dibêit séntârd âráund uât kónstitúts êi lidjitâmât rízân fór brêiking êi kóntrékt uid bôuf sáidz prízênting kâmpêling árɡiúmânts.
O debate centrou-se no que constitui uma razão legítima para romper um contrato, com ambas as partes apresentando argumentos convincentes.
Ðə dɪˈbeɪt ˈsɛn.tərd əˈraʊnd ˈwʌt ˈkɒn.stɪ.tuːts eɪ lɪˈdʒɪt.ə.mət ˈriː.zən fɔːr ˈbreɪ.kɪŋ eɪ ˈkɒn.trækt wɪð boʊθ saɪdz ˌpriːˈzent.ɪŋ kəmˈpel.ɪŋ ˈɑːr.ɡjuː.mənts. Dâ dibêit séntârd âráund uât kónstitúts êi lidjitâmât rízân fór brêiking êi kóntrékt uid bôuf sáidz prízênting kâmpêling árɡiúmânts.